Egale Canada Families / Familles Parliament / Parlement Pride / Fierte Supreme Court / Cour Supreme
 
 
NAVIGATION
 
-Home
-Search
-Site Map
-Printer Friendly
-Français
 
ACT NOW
 
-Donate
-Safe Schools Campaign
-climatesurvey.ca
-Canadians for Equal Marriage
- Stop Murder
Music
- Queering Black History 2010 Recipients
 
RESOURCES
 
-About Us
-Newsroom
-Newsletters
-Issues
 
-The Census
-Trans Issues
-Equal Marriage
 
-BC Marriage Case
-Ontario Marriage Case
-Quebec Marriage Case
-Parliamentary Reaction
-Supreme Court Reference
-Marriage across Canada
-Canadians for Equal Marriage
-Youth and Education
-Hate Crimes and Hate Propaganda
-Same-Sex Couples and Families
-International
-Diversity and Intersectionality
-Human Rights Protection
-Homophobia and Transphobia
-Parenting
-Immigration
-Sexuality and the State
-Elections
-Pride Events
 
INTERACT
 
-Donate
-Volunteer
-e-communities
-Contact Us
 

Globe and Mail agrees with Law Professors

The following editorial appeared in the Globe and Mail
on January 17, 2006:

“Wrong on same-sex law”

Stephen Harper has shown a casual disregard for legal reality in his position on same-sex marriage. More than 100 constitutional experts have now pinned the Conservative Leader to the rhetorical wall, pointing out the irresponsibility of this plank of his party’s platform and calling his plan untenable. In an open letter yesterday, they urged him to revise his stand. He should do so.

Mr. Harper has said that, if the Conservatives form the next government, he will give MPs a free vote on whether to change the 2005 law that recognized same-sex marriage. Most provincial courts had already ruled that denying same-sex marriage is unconstitutional because it unreasonably violates the equality rights of gays and lesbians under the Charter of Rights. Mr. Harper has pledged not to use the notwithstanding clause to override those equality rights. Thus, the law he envisions would be struck down by the courts. He has dismissed this contradiction by saying the Supreme Court of Canada would respect Parliament’s will (though the courts are bound by Parliament to uphold the Charter) and by insisting that the constitutional opinion on this subject is divided.

It is not divided, bar a rogue or two that Mr. Harper may have found to console him. “It appears to be your intention,” the open letter says, “to pass a law that you know is almost certainly unconstitutional and then leave it to the courts to clean up the mess.” If the Conservatives wish to do the right thing, they will abandon their ill-advised attempt to turn back time on a welcome, inclusive law. Failing that, as the experts advise, Mr. Harper should promise to refer a draft version of any bill to the Supreme Court for its opinion before placing the legislation before Parliament.

Click here to see the Law Professors' letter.

MyGSA.ca

Egale acknowledges the generous support from following organizations:

Sack Goldblatt Mitchell LLP

Ridout & Maybee LLP

VIA Rail Canada

CUPE 4400

Egale Canada ©2010

Advancing equality and justice for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans-identified people and their families across Canada